Field notes

Search

Search IconIcon to open search

I had just finished reading this book when the Supreme Court leak happened, which means my ear has been tuned to the language as the outrage exploded and conversations whirled around.

A large part of Emily Martin’s thesis is about the language and metaphor we use for the body—particularly women’s bodies. It’s mechanistic, it’s industrialized, it speaks in terms of gains and losses, waste and production. The medical model we have, from menstruation to menopause, is about irregularity, failure, waste product, syndromes, symptoms, malfunctions. Birth is seen as the one productive outcome, and even that isn’t accomplished by the woman—it’s accomplished by the uterus, the egg, the womb, all these disembodied parts.

It’s very dismembered, this language, and it’s everywhere. Fragmented, isolated, unintegrated, disordered, which has allowed for the long and depressingly misogynistic history of reproductive medicine,1 and excused the violences and injustice visited upon the woman herself.


Raw notes


Pull quotes

By focusing on birth as the thing that unites women, instead of menstruation, we get the prevailing cultural view that pregnancy is the end point and menstruation a wasteful failure, which excludes the ones who don’t want children, or are gay, or abstinent, or infertile. When menstruation is actually the one thing we all share, fertile, infertile, heterosexual, homosexual. (Note: this is still trans-exclusive)

Women are perceived as malfunctioning and their hormones out of balance rather than the organization of society and work perceived as in need of a transformation to demand less constant discipline and productivity.

Why only the losses, and not gains in complementary areas? Does the loss of concentration mean a greater ability to free-associate? Loss of muscle control, a greater ability to relax? Decreased efficiency, increased creativity, empathy, sensuality?

Female anger disrupts harmony. This entire account is premised on the unexamined cultural assumption that it is primarily a woman’s job to see that social relationships work smoothly in the family. Her own anger, however substantial the basis for it, must not be allowed to make life hard on those around her.

What is missing in these accounts is why, in Anglo and American societies, women might feel extreme rage at a time when their usual emotional controls are reduced.

“The mothers, if we could look inside their fantasies—we would see the embodiment of rage, of tragedy, of the overcharged energy of love, of inventive desperation, we would see the machinery of institutional violence wrenching at the experience of motherhood.” Adrienne Rich

Hot flashes and women’s and society’s responses to them are layered with levels upon levels of intentionality and interpretation, just as the same muscular contraction of the eyelid can be a twitch, a wink, a parody of a wink, a rehearsal of a parody of a wink, or a fake wink.

The single strongest predictors of longevity: not genetic heritage, physical functioning, or use of tobacco but simply one’s general satisfaction with work and overall happiness — the same predictor goes for contentment during menstruation or menopause.


  1. Borrowing this turn of phrase from Jesse Bering, Perv: The Sexual Deviant in All of Us ↩︎